Legal Opinion

In re Arbitration between Bronston & Glassman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.

We all agree that, where a general release is unequivocal and unambiguous, the mere assertion that there is a dispute concerning its meaning does not create an arbitrable issue since, under such circumstances, it may not be said that a bona fide dispute exists. (See Matter of Exercycle Corp. [Maratta], 9 N Y 2d 329, 334; Matter of Binger [Thatcher], 304 N. Y. 627; Matter of Minkin [Halperin], 304 N. Y. 617.) However, in view of the context in which the releases under consideration were drawn, it is clear that they are sufficiently dubious in content and meaning to require that the matter be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Minkin & HalperinNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. In re the Arbitration between Binger & ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of Nationwide Affinity Ins. Co. of Am. v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  2. Schlaifer v. SedlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API