Legal Opinion

Stewart v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 12, 1993No. 92-00497PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.

Joel Stewart challenges his habitual offender sentence and the imposition of costs relative to his conviction for burglary. We find no merit to his argument concerning costs. Because the requirements of the habitual offender statute were met, we affirm the trial court’s habitualization of appellant. We choose, however, to discuss one aspect of the sentencing.

The trial judge at sentencing seemed to express disagreement with other district’s rulings that sentencing under the habitual felony offender statute is permissive. He did not then have the benefit of either…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burdick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Tucker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  4. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. White v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API