Legal Opinion

Central Railroad v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 20, 1886PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Railroads. Damages. Negligence. Charge of Court. Life Tables. Trespass. Husband and Wife. Before Judge Carswell. Scriven Superior Court. November Adjourned Term, 1885. To the report contained in the decision, it is necessary to add only that the following were among the grounds of the motion for a new trial: (1) to (3.) Because the verdict was contrary to law, evidence and the charge of the court.

Read the full summary

Railroads. Damages. Negligence. Charge of Court. Life Tables. Trespass. Husband and Wife. Before Judge Carswell. Scriven Superior Court. November Adjourned Term, 1885. To the report contained in the decision, it is necessary to add only that the following were among the grounds of the motion for a new trial: (1) to (3.) Because the verdict was contrary to law, evidence and the charge of the court. (4.) Because the court erred in charging the jury as follows : “ The law required of them (defendant) extraordinary diligence in the protection of his person and life, until he had a safe and secure…

1Opinion of the Court

•Jackson, Chief Justice.'. Mrs. Thompson sued the Central Railroad and Banking Company of Georgia for the homicide of her husband, and recovered a verdict for the sum of $7,500.

The defendant made a motion for a new trial on twenty-two grounds, and assigns error on each of those grounds. They can be grouped together so as to make our task much less laborious than it would be should each be considered separately.

The homicide occurred near Station No. 6 of the Central Railroad, and was caused by the husband of plaintiff leaving the car before it reached the station at a spot some several hundred…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. McBride v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Hunt v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  5. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. AllisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API