Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Roche v. New Hampshire Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 14, 1951No. 4585_1Published

1ConcurrenceMagruder, Chief Judge

(concurring) .

I concur in the opinion and the judgment of the court.

The only error alleged is the failure of the district court to grant a directed verdict in favor of the trustee-plaintiff, who had the burden of proof on all the issues. Ordinarily a court will not direct a verdict in favor of the party having the burden of proof. Le Page v. St. Johnsbury Trucking Co., Inc., 1951, 97 N.H. 46, 80 A.2d 148. In some cases, this may be proper. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co. v. Converse, 1891, 139 U.S. 469, 11 S.Ct. 569, 35 L.Ed. 213; IX Wigmore on Evidence (3d Ed.1940) § 2495. But I…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. LePage v. St. Johnsbury Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API