Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arthur v. Walker

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 1, 2009No. S09A0765Published

1DissentThompson, Justice

A majority of this Court today holds that it is not reversible error for a trial court to fail to instruct a jury, when requested, as to the State’s burden of proof with regard to an affirmative defense. Because this holding is contrary to our case law and authorizes juries *581to determine the guilt or innocence of a defendant with no direction as to the evidentiary burden applicable to an affirmative defense, I dissent.

In Bishop v. State, 271 Ga. 291 (2) (519 SE2d 206) (1999), this Court resolved a three-decade long conflict in our cases concerning whether the failure to give a charge on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Conklin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. Bishop v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Siegel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  4. Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  5. Davenport v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API