Legal Opinion

Onion v. Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 30, 1989No. 4-89-0275PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann

Defendant, Chicago and Illinois Midland Railway Company, appeals (1) the trial court’s decision to give a jury instruction on pain and suffering, and (2) the trial court's refusal of an instruction on the nontaxability of the jury award.

Plaintiff, John R. Onion, a railroad employee, brought a personal injury action against his employer, the defendant, pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) (45 U.S.C. §51 et seq. (1982)). Over defendant’s objection the trial court decided not to instruct the jury that any damages awarded to plaintiff would not be subject to income tax.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Dempsey v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. Kingston v. TurnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Klawonn v. MitchellIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Pioneer Hi-Bred Corn Co. v. Northern Illinois Gas Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stift v. LizzadroAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. Yates v. Chicago National League Ball Club, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Ross v. Aryan International, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Pourchot v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Young v. HummelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API