Legal Opinion

Prendergast v. Eyermann

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 1885PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Lubke, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Rombauer, J.,

delivered.the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff brought this action to establish a copartnership between himself and the defendant in a certain building nontract, and for an account. The defendant denied the *388copartnership by answer, and set up four distinct counterclaims. The cause was sent to a referee by consent of the parties, to try all the issues between them, but without any special directions as to the manner of taking the account.

The referee heard the cause and reported to the court in substance as follows: That he found the partnership as claimed by the plaintiff. That…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. CapelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. Ely v. OwnbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1875

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. GivensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Johnson v. EwaldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Donovan v. BarnettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. J. Kennard & Sons Carpet Co. v. PeckMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. State ex rel. Pitts v. Peter Cooper Building & Loan Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API