Legal Opinion

Lee v. Florida Parole Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 13, 1999No. 97-4815PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Mr. Lee was charged with violating two conditions of his conditional release: the condition that he have no contact with a Ms. Thompson, and the condition that he obey the directions of his conditional release officer, viz., reporting by noon on a date certain. While Mr. Lee concedes that he did not *828appear at noon, he contends he was only an hour late. The record reveals he may have been as much as two hours late, but also reflects that he contacted his conditional release officer by telephone prior to his tardy appearance. The Florida Parole Commission found both violations had occurred and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Llumbet v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Griffin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Ross v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carswell v. Florida Parole CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Carswell v. Florida Parole CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API