Legal Opinion
Sephton v. Board of Education of City School District
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 16, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover back pay for the board of education’s allegedly unreasonable and arbitrary classification of substitute teachers, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated March 5,1982, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiffs allege that prior to September 1, 1975, per diem substitute teachers were compensated for each full day of service at a rate of one two-hundredth of what would be their annual salary. On July 30, 1975 the respondent board of education…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Union Free School District No. 6 v. New York State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Todd v. Board of Education of the City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Gross v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Tadken v. Board of Education, Port Washington Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Pulver v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McClellan v. Alexander Central School Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Taylor v. Hammondsport Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- White v. FreymanNew York Supreme Court · 1997
- North Shore Cent. Sch. Dist. v. Glen Cove City Sch. Dist.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025