Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Gretna Racing, LLC v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 2, 2016No. 1D14-3484Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

BILBREY, J.,

concurring in pari and in result. '

Following the retirement of the Honorable Nikki Clark from this Court the “luck of the draw”8 has placed me on the three judge panel assigned to consider the motion for rehearing. While there is no clear guidance on the appropriate standard the successor judge is to apply when passing on a motion for rehearing, my decision to grant rehearing is based on the following considerations.

Certainly, the judgment of a retired colleague is entitled to some deference. In considering the authority of a' successor trial judge, the Florida Supreme Court has…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Greater Loretta Imp. Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. BooneSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. Moonlit Waters Apartments, Inc. v. CauleySupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. Lee v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  4. Dept. of Bus. Reg. v. Classic Mile, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989
  5. City of St. Petersburg v. NasworthyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API