Commonwealth v. Kretchmar
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY BENDER, P.J.E.:
Appellant, Gary L. Kretchmar, appeals pro se from the order dismissing, as untimely, his petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act ("PCRA"), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541 - 9546. Appellant argues that his petition satisfied the retroactive constitutional right exception to the PCRA's timeliness requirements, Section 9545(b)(1)(iii), premised on our Supreme Court's decision in Commonwealth. v. Burton , 638 Pa. 687 , 158 A.3d 618 (2017). He also claims the PCRA court erred by dismissing his petition without a hearing. After careful review, we affirm.
This Court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Burton, S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. WattsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. RaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Com. v. Abdullah, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. Akan, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Alonzo, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- Com. v. Alston, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Austin, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.