Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kretchmar

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 1, 2018No. 3409 EDA 2017PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY BENDER, P.J.E.:

Appellant, Gary L. Kretchmar, appeals pro se from the order dismissing, as untimely, his petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act ("PCRA"), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541 - 9546. Appellant argues that his petition satisfied the retroactive constitutional right exception to the PCRA's timeliness requirements, Section 9545(b)(1)(iii), premised on our Supreme Court's decision in Commonwealth. v. Burton , 638 Pa. 687 , 158 A.3d 618 (2017). He also claims the PCRA court erred by dismissing his petition without a hearing. After careful review, we affirm.

This Court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Burton, S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Commonwealth v. WattsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. RaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Com. v. Abdullah, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Com. v. Akan, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Com. v. Alonzo, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. Com. v. Alston, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Com. v. Austin, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API