State v. Randall
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtRoggensack, J.
Alan Randall appeals a judgment recommitting him to the custody of the Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services at the Winnebago Mental Health Institute (WMHI) following his confinement there as an insanity acquittee. He claims: (1) that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when it refused to instruct the jury that the State was required to prove a level of dangerousness that could not be managed safely in the community; (2) that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to establish he is currently dangerous; and (3) that he was denied due process of law…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. GarciaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. SarinskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- State v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
- State v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- State v. MacKCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- State v. StoweCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.