Legal Opinion

Brown v. Benight

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1832PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

This is a suit in chancery transferred from the Vigo Circuit Court, the Circuit ■ Judge being interested. The bill states, that Samuel Bidleman and William Battels were jointly indebted to the complainant, in 1826, for the price of two-thirds of an Orleans’ boat and cargo of corn; that Bidleman died in Kew-Orleans, within six months or a year after the debt was contracted; that Battels is absent from the country and insolvent; and that a balance of the debt, being 182 dollars, and 25 cents, remains unpaid. The bill further states, that Samuel Bidleman, at the time of his death, was possessed…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Braxton v. State ex rel. AlbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Leach v. PrebsterIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Ellison v. ChapmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
  4. Devol v. HalsteadIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API