Street v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Judge.
Steven Street, a juvenile, appeals his conviction and sentence as an adult. He argues on appeal that the trial court erred when it imposed adult sanctions by using a printed form instead of making written individualized findings' as required by section 39.059(7)(c), *360Florida Statutes (1993). We agree and reverse.
Street pled nolo contendere to a felony, grand theft of a motor vehicle,1 and various misdemeanors. At his sentencing hearing, over Street’s repeated objections, the trial judge imposed adult sanctions. The trial court used a printed form entitled “WRITTEN FINDINGS…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Troutman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Norris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Varela v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Messam v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Satalino v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clarkson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996