Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Haymann

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 4, 1925No. 8705PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

For purposes of this opinion the following is a sufficient statement of the nature and result of the litigation:

The suit was brought by Mrs. Barbara Haymann, the widow, and other named plaintiffs, who were the children, of Joseph Haymann, deceased, to recover damages for the death of said Joseph Haymann, which it is alleged was caused by the negligence of the defendants. As originally brought, the suit was against P. E. Hanson and the Galveston City Transfer Company, but, by amendment of the petition, the suit was discontinued as to the Galveston City Transfer Company, and the Fidelity Union…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Choate v. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Choate v. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Blum v. StrongTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Aldridge v. Webb & HillTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Graham v. McCarty & BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cuellar v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Universal Automobile Insurance v. DentonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  3. Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Graves v. Southern UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. BordenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API