Legal Opinion

Riddle v. Bishop

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 3, 1938No. 28181PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This is a proceeding by a judgment creditor to amerce a sheriff pursuant to the provisions of section 469, O. S. 1931. Trial was had to the court without a jury and judgment was rendered for the sheriff, and plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff sought recovery from the sheriff for his failure to levy an execution issued on February 24, 1936, which writ the sheriff had returned on April 15, 1936, and upon which he had indorsed the following: “After checking execution, found it was incorrect and returned same without serving for correction.” This was occasioned by the fact that plaintiff’s judgment was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State National Bank v. LowensteinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. First Bank of Texola v. TerrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Pappe v. LawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Stein, Sheriff v. ScanlanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. McCorcle v. MortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bruce v. Employers Casualty Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Redwine v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API