State v. Khuram Ashfaq Choudhry
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
The statement of a co-defendant who absconded prior to trial was not admissible under a hearsay exception where there was no corroborating evidence to support its admission. Where the State did not offer any portion of the co-defendant’s statement into evidence, it did not “open the door” to the admission of the statement. Defendant waived any possible conflict of interest on the part of his trial attorney.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
On the evening of 3 November 2002, Khuram Choudhry (defendant), Umar Malik (Malik), and Hasan Sokoni (Sokoni) drove to a BP gas station…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Neville v. Appellate DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. ChoudhrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. ChoudhrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. Khuram Ashfaq ChoudhryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010