Legal Opinion

State v. Khuram Ashfaq Choudhry

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 17, 2010No. COA09-773PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

The statement of a co-defendant who absconded prior to trial was not admissible under a hearsay exception where there was no corroborating evidence to support its admission. Where the State did not offer any portion of the co-defendant’s statement into evidence, it did not “open the door” to the admission of the statement. Defendant waived any possible conflict of interest on the part of his trial attorney.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

On the evening of 3 November 2002, Khuram Choudhry (defendant), Umar Malik (Malik), and Hasan Sokoni (Sokoni) drove to a BP gas station…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Neville v. Appellate DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ChoudhrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. ChoudhrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  3. State v. Khuram Ashfaq ChoudhryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API