Legal Opinion
In Re Dillingham
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided October 10, 1962No. 90PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The Board assigns as error that Judge Huskins heard the proceeding on appeal de novo rather than on the record. This assignment of error is overruled.
The General Assembly at its Regular Session in 1957 enacted Ch. 744, Session Laws 1957, now codified as G.S. Ch. 93A, Real Estate Brokers and Salesmen, which is “An act to define, regulate and license real estate brokers and real estate salesmen in North Carolina and to create the North Carolina Real Estate Licensing Board and define its powers and duties, and to provide penalties for the violation of the provisions of the act.” The Board was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Victory Cab Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Turner Ex Rel. Turner v. Gastonia City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- State ex rel. Spriggs v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- Morecock v. . HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Ridge Community Investors, Inc. v. BerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- In Matter of RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- In Re a Filing Made by the North Carolina Fire Insurance Rating BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. North Carolina Reinsurance FacilitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.