Legal Opinion

Putman v. Southern Pacific Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1891PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.

This is an action, brought by the plaintiff as the widowed and dependent mother of Robert Putman, deceased, to recover damages from the defendant company on account of his death. In substance, the complaint alleges that the deceased was in the twenty-third year of his age; was active, strong, in good health, etc., and that up to his death by the wrongful act of the defendant, and long prior thereto, he had contributed largely to the plaintiff’s support, and would have continued to do so if he had lived, and that she was and still is in great need, etc.

After making the usual denials, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. BarronSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Parsons v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  3. Mayhew v. BurnsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. City of Chicago v. KeefeIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. Vining's AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1867

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Stevens v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Storm v. McClungOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Gattman v. FavroOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Rowe v. RichardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Goheen v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1972

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API