Legal Opinion

Amado v. Friedland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 9, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.), entered December 17, 1997, denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants-appellants dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiffs alleged injuries resulted from a slip and fall in a pothole on a public sidewalk abutting the Friedland defendants’ property. Defendants’ property manager established that defendants were not responsible for sidewalk maintenance or repair, which was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Granville v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Nuesi v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Acosta v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API