Legal Opinion
Hodges v. Demchuk
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 23, 1994No. 94 Civ. 0560 (SS)PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
SOTOMAYOR, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Richard Hodges moves for an order remanding this removed action to the New York Supreme Court, New York County, for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Hodges also seeks my recusal because of an alleged bias in favor of defendants. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiffs motion to remand this action and his motion for recusal are DENIED.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The complaint filed in state court alleges that in the course of conducting discovery or complying with discovery requests in Hodges’ two pending…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- City of Greenwood v. PeacockSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Wilds v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Bellido-Sullivan v. American International Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Core Litigation Trust ex rel. Kravitz v. Apollo Global Management, LLC (In re AOG Entertainment, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Nguyen v. Am. Express Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2017
- Backer v. Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.