State v. Kikuta
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
NAKAYAMA, J.
with whom RECKTENWALD, C.J., joins.
I respectfully dissent. In my view, there was no evidence supporting a parental discipline defense instruction under Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 703-309(1)(a) (1993). Additionally, the circuit court was not required to issue a special interrogatory on mutual affray sna sponte. Therefore, I would vacate the Intermediate Court of Appeals’ (ICA) memorandum opinion and affirm Cedric K. Kikuta’s (“Kikuta”) conviction.
A. Kikuta Was Not Entitled To a Parental Discipline Instruction Under HRS § 703-309(l)(a) and the Failure To…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Jackson v. DanbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.