Legal Opinion

D. C. Dockery v. Albert Dockery and Sarah Calhoun

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 15, 1971No. 24163PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

D. C. Dockery, a California State prisoner, appeals from an order dismissing his complaint pursuant to Rule 12, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The district court dismissed the complaint because of plaintiff’s failure “to elaborate the facts which underlie his claim” in this civil rights action against plaintiff’s brother and sister.

A dismissal of a complaint, without dismissal of the action, is not a “final order” under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 because the complaint is still open to amendment. Since we find no “special circumstances” here which indicate that the court below determined that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. William David Potter v. Tom McCall Governor of the State of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Calvin Winston Jackson v. Louis S. Nelson, Warden, Lieutenant Roger and Mr. Powell of San Quentin PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. GagosianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. Fletcher v. GagosianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. Eleanor M. Hemstreet, Member, Concerned Citizens of Justice, Inc. v. Edward C. SchadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API