Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Darwin Clark Bailey

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 13, 1973No. 72-1799Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge, with whom JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GODBOLD, INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges,

join (concurring in part and dissenting in part) :

I concur in the en banc Court’s affirmance of this conviction, but for the reasons stated in the panel opinion, 468 F.2d 652, I must respectfully dissent from the Court’s refusal to prohibit further use of the “dynamite charge” in this Circuit. The instant conviction was obtained after the trial judge delivered an Allen charge that the original panel held was in compliance with all requirements heretofore laid down in this…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. John Fioravanti, Nicholas Panaccione, and Angelo Pepe, Nicholas PanaccioneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. Charles FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API