Legal Opinion

Teetsel v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County

Decided April 19, 1965No. 266PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, J.,

This matter is before us on defendant’s exceptions to a decision of the court after a trial without a jury.

Plaintiffs, administrators of the estate of Ronald G. Teetsel, deceased, brought this action in assumpsit to recover on a “Family Compensation” clause in a “Century” automobile insurance policy issued by de*247fendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company to George Teetsel, father of the deceased, on September 6,1962.

The “Family Compensation” coverage extended death benefits to relatives while residents of the same household of the policyholder who suffered death by being struck…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blue Anchor Overall Co. v. Pennsylvania Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Cal-Farm Insurance v. BoisserancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Armon v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. MacDonald v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Beley v. Pennsylvania Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Griffith v. Security InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. Griffith v. Security InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API