McGraw v. Germania Fire Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. (Green, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.
1DissentChamplin, J.
This is an action of assumpsit brought by plaintiff to recover damages upon a policy of insurance.
On the 21st of April, 1882, the plaintiff and one Charles Wartrous were copartners, composing the firm of T. H. McGraw & Co., which firm were the owners of some eighteen million feet of pine saw-logs, then cut and skidded in Bay county, Michigan. The firm had in their employment one Charles C. Curtiss, who was the superintendent of T. H. McGraw & Co. in looking after their affairs generally, and had entire charge of their insurance business. The partners resided in the state of New York, but they…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bennett v. . JudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Veazie v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Baker v. . the Union Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Elwell v. . ChamberlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Cummins v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.