Legal Opinion

State v. Roberts

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1996No. 22717PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REVIEW SILAK, Justice.

Douglas Doyle Roberts (Roberts) appeals from the denial of his new trial motion challenging the district court’s evidentiary ruling that if he presented alibi evidence that he was out of state during the time period that three girls alleged prior uncharged molestations, the State would be permitted to show that Roberts spent this out of state time incarcerated in Nevada for a prior offense. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Roberts was charged with lewd and lascivious conduct with a minor under sixteen pursuant to I.C. § 18-1508, and sexual abuse of a child…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. BroadheadIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. ScrogginsIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. SharpIdaho Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. SeversonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. CurtisIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Milburn v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. MantheiIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Milburn v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API