Legal Opinion
Horelik v. Roth
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 23, 1988No. 5896PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiffs instituted an action for conversion against the solvent estate of the defendant’s decedent. From the judgment rendered in accordance with a report by an attorney trial referee in favor of the plaintiffs, the defendant has appealed claiming that the trial court erred (1) in concluding that the action was properly commenced, (2) in improperly admitting into evidence a letter written by the defendant’s former counsel, and (3) in finding a conversion by the estate.
The facts are undisputed. The plaintiff Horley’s, Inc., is a corporation owned by Daniel Horelik and Kevin Brawley.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Collens v. New Canaan Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Coleman v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- State v. CiminoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. WatermanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Luciani v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jarvis v. LiederConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- 3N International, Inc. v. Carrano (In re Carrano)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Cleary v. Dragone Classic Motorcars, No. Cv88 254790s (Sep. 9, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
- Horelik v. RothSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988