United States v. Jose Rodriguez
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant was tried on an indictment charging that he “did unlawfully, wilfully and knowingly embezzle a package which had come into his possession, and was intended to be conveyed by mail” in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1709. Appellant’s defense, in addition to an attack on the credibility of the Government’s witnesses, was that even under the state of facts testified to by the Government witnesses, the “decoy” parcel in question either was not, or at least might not have been, “intended to be conveyed by mail,” and that a critical element of the Government’s case was therefore lacking. On this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Goode v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Montgomery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Kelley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- United States v. FoyeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1853
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Erica HillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. RupertDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1981