Legal Opinion

Verner v. Verner

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appear from the Circuit Court of Monroe County. Hon. J. W. Buchanan, Judge. Mary Y. Yerner brought this action for damages against Sallie J. Yerner, for slander. The declaration alleges that the defendant testified against plaintiff in a cause before the chanceiy court; in which plaintiff was seeking alimony from her husband, Geo.

Read the full summary

Appear from the Circuit Court of Monroe County. Hon. J. W. Buchanan, Judge. Mary Y. Yerner brought this action for damages against Sallie J. Yerner, for slander. The declaration alleges that the defendant testified against plaintiff in a cause before the chanceiy court; in which plaintiff was seeking alimony from her husband, Geo. P. Yerner;. that the testimony complained of (and set out in the declaration) was false; that it was given in malice and not in good faith as a witness; and that the words “from their construction and common acceptation are considered as insults, and lead to…

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The immunity of a witness in a judicial proceeding from liability to an action for slander is not affected by § 1004 of the code. “Justice and the cause of good government would suffer if it were' otherwise,” and it is inconceivable that the legislature intended by the enactment of said section to inflict a blow on “justice and the cause of good government.”

Affirmed.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. KNOTTS BY KNOTTS v. HassellMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co. v. BrooksMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Hardtner v. SalloumMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Tattis v. KarthansMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Cooper v. DavidsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API