Legal Opinion · Dissent

Blue Fox Bar, Inc. v. City of Yankton

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1988No. 15721, 15739Published

1DissentSabers, Justice

Blue Fox Bar did not receive a fair trial because the trial court dismissed the breach-of-contract claim against the City of Yankton.

The trial court erred in dismissing the breach-of-contract claim where the City’s director of public works Eugene Hoag testified to the existence of a contractual agreement, including specific water and sewer rates.

Q. (By Plaintiff’s Counsel) ... At that time in 1984 the Super-8 was outside the city limits of Yankton; is that correct?

A. Yes, that’s correct.

Q. And that was under a contractual agreement with the Super-8, since they were outside the city limits the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ericksen v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Trimont Land Co. v. Truckee Sanitary DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Bleick v. City of PapillionNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State Board of Education v. City of YpsilantiMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API