Legal Opinion

Dang v. Pontier

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 30, 2024No. 3:19-cv-01519Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH DANG, Case No.: 19cv1519-LL-DDL 12 Plaintiff, ORDER: 13 v. (1) DENYING MOTION TO 14 DAVID PONTIER, et al., DISMISS; AND 15 Defendants. (2) DENYING MOTION FOR 16 CHANGE OF VENUE 17 DAVID PONTIER, 18 Counter Claimant, [ECF Nos. 190, 195] 19 v. 20 JOSEPH DANG, et al., 21 Counter Defendants. 22 23 Before the Court is Defendant and Counter Claimant David Pontier’s Motion to 24 Dismiss [ECF No. 190] and Motion for Change of Venue [ECF No. 195]. No responses to 25 the Motions have been filed. The Court finds…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. TashireSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. David Pride, Jr. v. M. CorreaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API