Legal Opinion

State v. Moffett

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 2, 1981No. FILE No. 994PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

A jury convicted the defendant of being an accessory to the crime of criminal mischief in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-8 and § 53a-116. From the judgment rendered, the defendant has appealed, claiming that the trial court erred by (1) allowing the defendant to be represented by out-of-state counsel without first complying with Practice Book § 24; (2) denying the defendant effective assistance of counsel; (3) permitting the state to file a substitute information without allowing the defendant to move for a bill of particulars or granting the defendant a reasonable…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SpigaroloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. KylesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. State v. AlmedaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. State v. McDougalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API