Cross v. Cross
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court of Detroit. (Chipman, J.) Divorce bill. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Complainant having filed a hill of divorce alleging marriage and various acts relied on as statutory-grounds of cruelty, and abandonment without provision, defendant put in a plea denying the marriage, and issue being joined on this, complainant prevailed and the case was ordered to proceed to answer. Defendant appeals.
The bill avers a regular marriage in Sandwich, Ontario, on May IT, 1881, both parties living in the township of Spring-wells near Detroit, and a reason for marriage in Canada being stated to be a desire to keep it from the knowledge of defendant’s family. It is set out that…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Davidson v. Unknown Heirs of PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Pegg v. PeggSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Shepherd & Pierson Co. v. BakerMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Jones v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- State v. NewmanMontana Supreme Court · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.