Finkelman v. Kaufman
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
Exceptions overruled, with double costs to the plaintiff. In the absence of an abuse of discretion, which was not shown here, the refusal to grant a postponement of a trial presents no question of law. Noble v. Mead-Morrison Manuf. Co. 237 Mass. 5. An exception alleged to have been taken to a ruling made by a judge at a pre-trial hearing who was still in service and different from the trial judge could not have been included in a bill of exceptions allowed by the latter. Brooks v. Shaw, 197 Mass. 376, 378-379. No exception lies to the refusal to grant special leave to file requests for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brooks v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Noble v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Donnelly v. LarkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Robertson v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Gibbons v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hebner v. McMahonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
- Green v. Swift & Bachman, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1961
- Kalus v. Thompson Club Unit Owners' TrustMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1993