Legal Opinion

Hinchman v. Parlin & Orendorff Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 5, 1896No. 454PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to tbe Circuit Court of tbe United States for tbe Northern District of Texas.

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Circuit Judge.

This is a statutory action for trial of tbe right to personal property taken under judicial process. Tbe defendant in error, tbe Parlin & Orendorff Company, held a judgment against Acanthus Hinehman and others, on which execution issued and was levied on tbe personal property in question. When tbe marshal bad made tbe seizure, tbe claimant, Martha A. Hinch-man, made her affidavit and bond under tbe statute, tbe property was surrendered to her, due return made of the affidavit and bond, and this cause docketed for trial. Tbe plaintiff in tbe execution (tbe defendant in…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. BrothersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. Ilfeld v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Hinchman v. Parlin & Orendorff Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API