Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Rhodes

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 15, 1971PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNearn, J.

This is a case of first impression. Able Briefs have been filed and lucid argument made by both sides to this controversy.

Although more than one Assignment of Error has been made, the basic question determinative of the case is as follows:

* ‘ Can a testator in his will require that a beneficiary under his will, who has no claim on the estate absent the will, dismiss litigation pending against the testator as a condition precedent to receiving a bequest or devise under the will, it being specifically provided in the will that — ‘This election to take under this will, or to pursue the pending…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. South Norwalk Trust Co. v. St. JohnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
  2. Emmco Insurance Co. v. Beacon Mutual Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Tate v. CampTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Winters v. American Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Williams v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wood v. LoweryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
  2. Trinity Industries, Inc. v. McKinnon Bridge Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  3. Alexander v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
  4. Cheryl O. Charles v. Gisselle Carter NeelyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
  5. Dainton v. WatsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API