Legal Opinion

Perez v. Pennsuco Cement & Aggregates

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 10, 1985No. BC-237PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZEHMER, Judge.

The appealed workers’ compensation order denied the claim of Pedro Luis Perez (claimant) for future attendant care services and attendant services performed by claimant’s wife since August 1981. Penn-suco Cement & Aggregates and Insurance Company of North America (employer and carrier) contend that attendant care is not needed and that, alternatively, the services rendered by Mrs. Perez are not compensa-ble because they were gratuitous in nature. We reverse.

Claimant is a victim of manganese intoxication poisoning sustained while employed as a welder by Building Materials, Inc.,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Walt Disney World Co. v. HarrisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. WeaverSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  3. Sealey Mattress Co. v. GauseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Lopez v. Pennsuco Cement & Aggregates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. City of Leesburg v. BallietDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. St. Clair v. County of GrantNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Méndez Orellana v. Fondo del Seguro del EstadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1996
  3. Rodriguez v. Howard IndustriesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Henry v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API