Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lori Barcroft v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 2017No. 49A05-1704-CR-844Published

1DissentBrown, Judge

[37] I respectfully dissent from the majority as to its finding that the evidence of probative value leads only to the conclusion that Barcroft was insane, or unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of her conduct, at the time of the offense.

[38] The Indiana Supreme Court has noted that a "finding that a defendant was not insane at the time of the offense warrants substantial deference from reviewing courts." Myers v. State , 27 N.E.3d 1069, 1074 (Ind. 2015) (citing Galloway v. State , 938 N.E.2d 699, 709 (Ind. 2010) (citing Barany v. State , 658 N.E.2d 60, 63 (Ind. 1995) )). Thus, when a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barany v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Thompson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Galloway v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Donald W. Myers, III. v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Carson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API