Legal Opinion

In re Balsamo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 28, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

In a *906proceeding pursuant to SCPA 2103 to disclose and recover certain assets alleged to be a part of the decedent’s estate, F. Paul Balsamo appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Richmond County (Gigante, S.), dated February 28, 2008, as granted that branch of the petitioner’s motion which was, in effect, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 for an award of costs and an attorney’s fee against him, in the sum of $2,597.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs payable by the appellant personally.

The Surrogate’s Court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Minister, Elders & Deacons of the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church v. 198 Broadway, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. RCN Construction Corp. v. Fleet Bank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Wesche v. WescheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API