Legal Opinion

Cauley v. . Dunn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Whedbee, J., at January Term, 1914, of Lekoir, on appeal from a justice of the peace.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

This action is brought upon the following bond:

$114.60. KinstoN, N. C., October, 1904.

Two years after date I promise to pay Harriet Cauley $114.60. Value received. Payable at the Dime Bank, Kinston, N. C.

Chas. E. DuhN. [seal]

No. 43. Due 17 October, 1906.

The defendant’s plea before the justice was as follows: “The defendant did not deny the note, but offered evidence to show that the plaintiff had agreed that he might pay in installments until the note was paid. The plaintiff denied any such agreement.”

The defendant asked in the Superior Court to be allowed to amend his plea and set up “no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. . RileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. Shaw v. . BurneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. Forbes v. . McGuireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chisholm v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Proffitt Mercantile Co. v. State Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. International Harvester Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Sanford v. Junior Order of United American MechanicsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Harvester Co. v. . ParhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API