Legal Opinion

Tennis Bros. v. Wetzel & T. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern West Virginia

Decided August 22, 1905No. 630PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

DAYTON, District Judge.

On the 15th day of April, 1903, a contract was entered into between Tennis Bros. Company, a corporation under the laws of Delaware, and the Wetzel & Tyler Railway Company, a corporation under the laws of West Virginia, whereby the first party agreed to supervise the construction of an electric railway for the second party, furnishing its own service and that of its engineers and office force to an extent necessary to efficiently and promptly construct the same; to obtain proposals for supplies and material, and submit them for approval to the railway company’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Toledo Tie & L. Co. v. ThomasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Cushwa v. Improvement L. & B. Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Quesenberry v. People's Building, Loan & Savings Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Floyd v. National Loan & Investment Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tredegar Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1910
  2. Houston Lumber Co. v. Wetzel & Tyler Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Chas. E. & W. E. Peck, Ltd. v. Southwestern Lumber & Exporting Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  4. Wood v. Isgrigg Lumber Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API