Legal Opinion

People v. Labelle

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 2010No. B223468PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*151Opinion

YEGAN, P. J.

Matthew Labelle appeals from the judgment after the trial court found that he was a mentally disordered offender (MDO). (Pen. Code, § 2960 et seq.)1 The commitment offense was felony vandalism. (§ 594, subds. (a), (b)(1).) Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the trial court’s finding that the commitment offense met the force or violence criterion of section 2962, subdivision (e)(2)(Q). The contention is without merit and we affirm the judgment.

Commitment Offense

A hotel employee notified the police that appellant “was challenging people to fight…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. People v. KORTESMAKICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. People v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. Andrew H. CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. People v. Coffer CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. People v. Linares CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. Warren, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. The People v. St. Juste CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API