Legal Opinion

Treager v. Gordon-Allen, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 15, 1934No. 7281PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree enjoining appellant from manufacturing or selling any granulated laundry soap under the name of “Par,” or with which the word “Par” is used in any way whatsoever, and from operating or doing business under or using the name “Par Soap Company,” or any other name incorporating the word “Par” in these same connections.

The facts as found by the District Court, and which are sustained by the record, are substantially as follows: The parties assert eonflictin'g rights to the use of the word “Par” as a trade-mark in the general field of soap…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Standard Brands, Inc. v. SmidlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  2. Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
  3. Sunbeam Lighting Co. v. Sunbeam CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  4. Arrow Distilleries, Inc. v. Globe Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  5. Landers, Frary & Clark v. Universal Cooler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API