Legal Opinion

Craig v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Stearns, J., presiding, sustaining demurrers to the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Diciíinson, J.1

The plaintiff, declaring himself to be the owner in fee of certain real estate, prosecutes this action to determine the adverse claims of the defendants. This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. The facts alleged as constituting the plaintiff’s cause.of action are as follows: In 1887, these defendants, asserting their title to this land, commenced an action of ejectment against certain persons who were in possession, — the plaintiff’s grantors, as hereafter stated. The defendants in that action asserted title, and also that they…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Felter v. MullinerNew York Supreme Court · 1807
  2. Overall v. PeroMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Flynn v. LemieuxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. SimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Leighton v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API