People v. Lucas
Appellate Court of Illinois
1DissentJustice McDADE
The majority has held that a conviction for enhanced driving while license revoked (DWLR) can serve as the predicate felony for a conviction for armed violence and that the State proved defendant guilty of armed violence on that basis. I believe that decision to be wrong and, therefore, dissent.
Although I would thus not reach defendant’s other two issues, I will discuss them because the majority has done so. Therefore, assuming, solely for purposes of argument and without conceding the point, that the majority’s decision on the first two issues is correct, I would concur with the holding that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- People v. SharpeIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. StaceyIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
- People of Illinois v. HaronIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- The People v. CoulsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.