Legal Opinion
People v. Schor
Nassau County District Court
Decided May 21, 1987PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bruce D. Alpert, J.
The defendants have moved this court for a ruling in limine whether an "expert” will be permitted to testify with respect to the reliability of eyewitness identification. While only defendant Schor has submitted memoranda in support of the relief requested, the other two defendants have also joined in *637his application. The defendants’ motion is hereby denied for the reasons cited herein.
FACTS
On October 1, 1985, the defendants were arrested and charged with two counts of assault in the third degree.
Wade and Huntley hearings were held wherein the facts of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- De Long v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. AllweissNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. CroninNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Dougherty v. . MillikenNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Selkowitz v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. LeGrandNew York Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. Lewis, New York County Courts1987
- State v. GunterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- People v. DrakeNew York Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. BarnwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.