Legal Opinion

Folse v. Triche

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 21, 1904No. 15,329PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-Seventh Judicial District Court, Parish of Assumption; Paul Lache, Judge. Action by Mathilda Folse against Charles-L. Triche, sheriff, and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

This case came before ús originally on a certificate for instructions 'from the judges of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal, and we, instead of answering the question propounded, ordered the whole record to be sent up for our consideration.

There seems to be no dispute about the-facts, and the question of law is whether the machinery and appliances of the sugar house destroyed by fire, “all in a demolished and ruined condition, but containing much valuable metal,” are movables or immovables.

The district judge held that said machinery and appliances had not lost their character as immovables by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Succession of AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
  2. Citizens' Bank v. KnappSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1870
  3. Weil v. LapeyreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1886

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. Baumer Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  2. Mathieu v. NettlesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. State v. HendersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Wakefield State Bank v. T. Fitzwilliams & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  5. Von Puhl v. Caire & GraugnardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API