Legal Opinion
Tomsky v. Kaczka
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 3, 1952PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
17 N.J. Super. 211 (1952)
85 A.2d 809
MARIE TOMSKY AND WALTER TOMSKY, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
MARY KACZKA AND JOHN KACZKA, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 10, 1951.
Decided January 3, 1952.
Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.
Mr. Harry Chashin argued the cause for the plaintiffs-respondents (Mr. Edmund Polonitza, attorney).
Mr. Elmer J. Bennett argued the cause for the defendants-appellants (Messrs. Patrick A. Dwyer, James P. Beggans and Milton A. Dauber, of counsel and on the brief; Messrs. Carpenter, Gilmour & Dwyer,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Phillips v. Library Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
- Oelschlaeger v. Hahne & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Schnatterer v. BambergerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
- Furey v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
- Lordi v. SpiottaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barnes v. LednumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
- Tua v. Modern Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Cupita v. Carmel Country Club, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- TAHAN EX REL. TAHAN v. Wagaraw Holding Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Scheri v. DePaoloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.