Helmly v. Davis
Supreme Court of Georgia
Dismissal of motion for new trial. Before Judge Seabrook. Effingham superior court. November 16, 1899.
1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.
Where a motion for a new trial is made in term and ordered heard on a certain day in vacation, and, through no fault on thepart of the movant, is not heard on the day appointed, and no order is.taken extending the time, such motion is, by operation of law, returned to the court and remains until called up in its order. It is error to dismiss such a motion because it was not heard at the appointed time. “ Jurisdiction to proceed in term is not lost by an order to hear at chambers.” Higginbotham v. Campbell, 85 Ga. 639 ; Civil Code, § 5485 ; Dozier v. Owens, 63 Ga. 541; Brantley v. Hass, 69 Ga.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carroll v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. PoolSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Dozier v. OwenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
3Cited by4 opinions
- Luke v. LukeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- McPhail v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Richards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Moore v. Citizens BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917